Seventeen and counting: can Accra finally break the IMF habit?

President Mahama has declared Ghana’s $3bn Extended Credit Facility complete — six decades after the country’s first dance with the Fund. History suggests the harder programme begins now.

By Daniel Kojo HOLLIE

When the Jubilee House statement landed on the afternoon of Friday, 15 May 2026, the language carried the cadence of finality. The Government of Ghana, the Presidency said through Minister of State for Government Communications Felix Kwakye Ofosu, had formally exited its Extended Credit Facility (ECF) programme with the International Monetary Fund, ahead of schedule, with macroeconomic stability and debt sustainability restored. The country, the statement said, now had “the capacity to withstand external shocks and stand on its own feet.”

It was, by almost any measure, a remarkable turnaround. Inflation, which had ended 2024 at 23.8 percent, was 3.3 percent in February, the fourteenth consecutive monthly deceleration and the lowest reading since the 2021 CPI rebase. The cedi, after years of bruising losses, closed 2025 as the world’s best-performing currency, appreciating by roughly 40 percent against the US dollar. Gross international reserves had climbed to about US$14.5 billion, equivalent to nearly six months of import cover. Ghana’s sovereign rating had moved from restricted default to “B” with a positive outlook, five upgrades in succession. The fiscal primary balance had swung to a 2.5 percent surplus, comfortably above the 1.5 percent target.

The numbers tell a story of competent crisis management. They do not tell the story of why Ghana keeps having crises.

A 66-year habit

Friday’s announcement closed the country’s seventeenth financial bailout programme with the IMF since joining the Bretton Woods institution in September 1957. Seventeen programmes in sixty-eight years works out to one fresh appeal to Washington roughly every four years, a cadence too consistent to be dismissed as bad luck, and too persistent to be blamed on any single administration.

The pattern began almost immediately after Kwame Nkrumah’s overthrow. Between 1966 and 1969, the National Liberation Council ran three successive Standby Arrangements as it dismantled Nkrumah’s state-led “Big Push” and steered the economy back toward the Fund’s orthodoxy. The Busia administration that succeeded the NLC was forced, by December 1971, into a further devaluation and a fresh approach to the IMF, a sequence that helped trigger the 1972 coup.

The next descent came after the long Acheampong years and the chaos of the late 1970s. By January 1979, Ghana was back at the Fund’s door. But it was the 1983 Economic Recovery Programme, launched under Flt. Lt. Jerry Rawlings’ Provisional National Defence Council, that defined the modern relationship. Faced with triple-digit inflation, empty shelves, a collapsed cedi and a fleeing professional class, Accra accepted one of the most ambitious structural adjustments programmes the Fund had ever supervised. Stability returned; so, did social dislocation, an experience that still colours public debate about IMF programmes a generation later.

The late 1990s and early 2000s saw Ghana qualify for and benefit from the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative under President John Kufuor, debt relief that, on the official accounting, took external obligations from some US$66 billion in 2003 to about US$23 billion by 2006 and freed resources for schools, clinics and roads. A non-financing Policy Support Instrument followed, the same instrument category Ghana is now re-entering.

Then came the modern triad. In 2009, the Mills administration accepted a US$602 million ECF in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. In April 2015, the Mahama government, confronting the dumsor power crisis, a yawning wage bill and a cedi in free-fall, signed a US$918 million ECF that demanded a freeze on hiring, removal of utility and fuel subsidies, a clean-up of the banking sector and an end to Bank of Ghana overdrafts to the Treasury. And in May 2023, after Ghana’s sovereign default of December 2022, the Akufo-Addo administration secured the US$3 billion ECF that has just been concluded.

The throughline is uncomfortably clear. Each programme arrived after a fiscal blow-out. Each was preceded by election-cycle spending, monetary financing of deficits, and an exchange-rate adjustment that came too late. Each restored a measure of stability. None broke the cycle.

What is genuinely different in 2026

To the Mahama administration’s credit, the recovery now being celebrated was neither inevitable nor cosmetic. The programme had veered off track in late 2024; by the time the new government took office in January 2025, the cedi had lost roughly a fifth of its value over the year, lending rates were above 30 percent, and the fiscal deficit had ballooned to 7.9 percent of GDP. Frontloaded fiscal consolidation, expenditure rationalisation, a credible primary surplus target, and a renewed Bank of Ghana posture, including the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme and the new gold-backed reserve framework enshrined in the Ghana Accelerated National Reserve Accumulation Programme (GANRAP), together restored programme credibility within months.

The macro dividends are real. Public debt has fallen from 61.8 percent of GDP to 45.3 percent, the steepest one-year drop in a generation, helped by the conclusion of bilateral and external commercial restructurings under the G20 Common Framework. The current account has swung from a US$1.5 billion deficit to a surplus measured in billions. Real GDP grew 6.0 percent in 2025; the Fund projects 4.8 percent for 2026.

But the Fund itself has been careful to qualify the applause. Speaking at the October 2025 sub-Saharan Africa Regional Economic Outlook launch, Abebe Aemro Selassie, Director of the IMF’s African Department, said the test would be whether discipline held “over the next two, three, four years.” Local analysts have been blunter. EM Advisory, in a February 2026 sensitivity note, warned that each 5 percent shortfall in tax revenue translates into roughly 0.7 percentage points of GDP in additional fiscal deterioration; combined with a 5 percent wage overrun, the cash deficit could breach Fiscal Responsibility Act limits at 5.7 percent of GDP. The Institute of Economic Affairs has gone further. Its board chairman, Dr. Charles Mensa, has openly cautioned that without deeper structural reform, an eighteenth bailout is not a remote scenario.

The diagnosis Accra keeps avoiding

Underneath the recurring crisis is a recurring economic structure. Ghana exports raw commodities, gold, cocoa, increasingly oil, and imports almost everything else. When commodity prices are kind, foreign exchange flows in, the cedi firms, fiscal space widens, and political pressure to spend mounts. When prices turn, or global financing tightens, the structure reveals itself: a narrow tax base, a wage bill that consumes a disproportionate share of revenue, debt service that crowds out development spending, and a central bank historically too willing to underwrite the deficit. In 2022, Bank of Ghana overdrafts to government reached 7.2 percent of GDP, well above the 5 percent statutory ceiling in the Bank of Ghana Act, 2002 (Act 612).

This is not, in the end, a story about the IMF. It is a story about a developing economy that has not yet built the institutions to manage its own resource rents and its own political business cycle.

What Accra must do differently

If the seventeenth programme is to be the last, several things must change, not in slogan form, but in legislation, in budget execution and in political culture.

Anchor the fiscal stance in credible law, not promises. The Fiscal Responsibility Act, 2018 (Act 982) has been honoured more in suspension than in observance. A fully independent Fiscal Council, with statutory authority to certify budget assumptions, audit out-turns and publish quarterly compliance reports, would shift the cost of slippage from technocrats to politicians. The Bank of Ghana’s amended Act and the prohibition on monetary financing must be defended, not waived in the next stress episode.

Broaden the revenue base instead of squeezing it. Ghana’s tax-to-GDP ratio remains stubbornly below the sub-Saharan African average. The answer is neither another nuisance tax nor a higher VAT rate but a serious assault on the informal economy through digitalisation of the Ghana Revenue Authority, integration of TIN with mobile-money and bank data, rationalisation of exemptions, and a renegotiation of the more egregious stability agreements in mining and oil. Mr. Selassie’s prescription is the right one: build public trust by linking visible tax effort to visible public goods.

Discipline the wage bill, structurally. Compensation of employees has repeatedly been the trigger for fiscal blow-outs. A binding rule that public-sector wages cannot grow faster than non-oil revenue, enforced through the budget and audited annually, would do more than another freeze that lasts until the next election.

Build genuine counter-cyclical buffers. Ghana’s Stabilisation Fund and Heritage Fund were sound ideas, hollowed out by repeated raids. A reformed sovereign wealth architecture, closer to Botswana’s Pula Fund or Chile’s copper stabilisation rules than to the current Ghanaian practice, should accumulate during commodity upswings and disburse only against pre-announced rules during downswings. The GANRAP gold-reserve framework is a promising start; it must not become another piggy-bank.

Move beyond the commodity treadmill. The 2023 default was, at root, a balance-of-payments failure dressed as a fiscal one. The ECOWAS Trade Liberalisation Scheme and the African Continental Free Trade Area offer the structural escape route Ghana’s policy class has long invoked but rarely operationalised: value-added exports, regional industrial supply chains, services trade. Until “Made in Ghana” earns serious foreign exchange, the country will remain hostage to gold, cocoa and oil prices set in London, New York and Singapore.

Treat debt as an investment decision, not a financing one. Every cedi of new borrowing, domestic or external, should be matched to a project whose revenue or productivity gain credibly services it. Ghana’s debt sustainability analyses must be published in full, not in summary; the new Policy Coordination Instrument, properly used, can entrench precisely this transparency.

The honest answer

Is this, then, the final chapter? On the evidence available in May 2026, the conditions exist, improved reserves, restructured debt, single-digit inflation, an administration explicitly committed to fiscal discipline, for the country to break the four-year cycle. But the same was said in 1970, after HIPC completion in the early 2000s, and on the conclusion of the 2015–2019 programme. Each time, the buffers eroded before the structure changed.

Ghana’s seventeenth IMF programme has ended. Whether it proves to be the last will be decided not in Washington, but in Accra, in the 2027 and 2028 budgets, in the Bank of Ghana’s willingness to say no, and in the political appetite to legislate the disciplines that programmes have so far had to impose from outside.

The bailout era is, technically, over. The graduation has just begun.

Daniel Kojo Hollie is a writer covering Ghanaian law, business, Trade and economic policy. He contributes to the Business & Financial Times. The writer welcomes correspondence at [email protected]

The post Seventeen and counting: can Accra finally break the IMF habit? appeared first on The Business & Financial Times.

Read Full Story