The microfinance industry is calling for recalibrating the Bank of Ghana’s (BoG) revised capital framework, urging a rethink of both the proposed minimum capital thresholds and their tight implementation timeline.
The Ghana Association of Microfinance Companies (GAMC), operators, consultants and academics – although broadly endorsing the direction of reform – caution that while the regulatory overhaul is well-intentioned, its current configuration could generate unintended consequences which undermine financial inclusion, distort market structure and amplify systemic fragility.
At a high-level roundtable in Accra recently, discussions centred on BoG’s January 27, 2026 guidelines, which require existing institutions transitioning into Microfinance Banks to meet a minimum capital threshold of GH¢50million by December 31, 2026, while new entrants must raise GH¢100million.
With a pathway declaration deadline set for June 30, 2026, industry players say the compliance window is already under strain.
The reform itself is not in dispute, rather the concern is whether its design sufficiently reflects operational realities of the country’s microfinance ecosystem.
GAMC Board Chair Rebecca Addo described the intent of engagement as constructive rather than adversarial, insisting that industry concerns should be viewed as input into refinement rather than resistance to reform.
She acknowledged that BoG’s objectives – including stronger governance, improved resilience, enhanced depositor protection and sector modernisation – align with long-standing industry aspirations.
The point of divergence however lies in how those objectives are translated into enforceable capital and structural requirements. The framework’s most contested element is the GH¢50million minimum capital requirement for existing microfinance institutions seeking to operate as Microfinance Banks.
Industry operators argue that the scale of increase risks being disproportionate to the sector’s business model and client base.
The Chief Executive-Equity Focus Microfinance, Ebenezer Odame, believes capital alone does not fix governance failures. The quality of supervision and internal discipline matters just as much.
Furthermore, David Narh Aguda, Managing Consultant at Protégé Consult, warned that the uniform application of a GH¢50million threshold across over 130 institutions could create distortions in capital allocation.
He added that the microfinance ecosystem – characterised by small average loan sizes and high-volume, low-margin transactions – may not be able to efficiently intermediate such large capital inflows without structural adjustment.
For many stakeholders, the debate is shaped by recent history.
The post Editorial: Microfinance companies up in arms over BoG minimum capital appeared first on The Business & Financial Times.
Read Full Story
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Instagram
Google+
YouTube
LinkedIn
RSS