Unlocking diaspora remittances for investment growth

By Dr. Richmond Akwasi Atuahene

Diaspora remittances have become one of Africa’s most important sources of external financing, exceeding foreign direct investment (FDI) and official development assistance (ODA) in several countries, including Ghana. According to World Bank estimates, formal remittances to Africa reached about US$86 billion in 2019, while broader estimates including informal and in-kind transfers place total annual flows near US$200 billion. In Sub-Saharan Africa, remittance inflows grew strongly in recent years, supporting economies facing inflation, debt distress, food insecurity, and external financing constraints.

Ghana has emerged as one of the continent’s leading remittance destinations. Inflows rose from roughly US$2 billion in 2014 to US$4.8 billion in 2024 before surging to a record US$7.8 billion in 2025. This growth has been driven by digital financial innovation, improved regulation, fintech partnerships, and increased diaspora confidence in Ghana’s macroeconomic reforms. The Bank of Ghana’s Payment Systems and Services Act (2019), the National Payment Systems Strategic Plan, and updated Guidelines for Inward Remittance Services (UGIR 2025) significantly improved formal remittance channels through mobile money, fintech platforms, and cash-to-account services.

Remittances now account for roughly 6% of Ghana’s GDP and have become a stable source of foreign exchange. However, most of these inflows continue to finance household consumption, including education, health, funerals, and housing, rather than productive investment. This has prompted the Bank of Ghana, under Governor Dr. Johnson Asiama, to explore diaspora bonds as a mechanism to transform remittance flows into long-term development finance.

The central argument is that Ghana can use diaspora bonds to channel diaspora savings into infrastructure, energy, transportation, and other productive sectors while reducing dependence on expensive external borrowing. Because remittances are stable and countercyclical, they can potentially be securitised and used as collateral for raising investment capital.

Global Lessons from Israel and India

The experiences of Israel and India provide important lessons for Ghana.

Israel has successfully used diaspora bonds for decades to finance infrastructure, transportation, telecommunications, and national development. The country offered flexible investment structures, including fixed and floating rates, varying maturities, and access for both diaspora and non-diaspora investors. Israel also registered its bonds with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), increasing investor confidence and expanding access to international retail investors.

India, by contrast, used diaspora bonds more strategically during periods of balance-of-payments pressure and external financing shortages. India focused primarily on diaspora investors and relied on fixed-rate structures. Although India avoided the regulatory burden of SEC registration, it also sacrificed broader access to global investors.

The key lesson from both countries is that patriotism alone is insufficient. Successful diaspora bonds combine emotional connection with strong financial engineering, regulatory credibility, competitive returns, and flexible product design.

Africa’s Experience with Diaspora Bonds

Africa’s record with diaspora bonds has been mixed, reflecting both opportunities and institutional weaknesses.

Ghana’s 2007 Golden Jubilee Bond

Ghana’s first diaspora bond initiative in 2007 underperformed significantly. The Golden Jubilee Savings Bond targeted Ghanaians at home and abroad with a 15% interest rate but raised only 40% of its target, with diaspora participation contributing just 6%.

The failure stemmed largely from restrictive eligibility criteria that excluded dual nationals, second-generation migrants, and non-citizen affiliates with strong Ghanaian ties. The instrument also lacked broader market appeal and sufficient investor confidence.

Ethiopia’s Renaissance Dam Bonds

Ethiopia launched ambitious diaspora bond programs beginning in 2008 to finance the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. The country introduced flexible currency options, varying maturities, and lower subscription thresholds.

Despite strong patriotic symbolism, the bonds struggled due to governance concerns, political risk, institutional distrust, and regulatory complications involving the U.S. SEC. Participation remained modest relative to the project’s financing requirements.

Kenya’s Infrastructure Bond

Kenya’s 2011 diaspora-linked infrastructure bond achieved a 70% subscription rate, reflecting strong market interest. However, nationality restrictions and high investment thresholds limited broader participation.

Nigeria’s 2017 Breakthrough

Nigeria’s 2017 diaspora bond is widely viewed as Africa’s most successful example. The US$300 million issuance was listed in the United States and United Kingdom, regulated by major authorities, and marketed through established financial institutions. The bond was oversubscribed by 130%.

Nigeria succeeded because it addressed critical weaknesses seen elsewhere. It broadened investor access, complied with international regulatory standards, offered competitive pricing, and built investor confidence through transparency and credible structuring.

Key Risks and Challenges Facing Ghana

Despite the potential benefits, Ghana faces substantial structural and credibility risks in implementing a successful diaspora bond strategy.

Trust Deficit Following the Domestic Debt Exchange Programme (DDEP)

The 2022/2023 Domestic Debt Exchange Programme severely weakened investor confidence. Bondholders experienced maturity extensions and significant losses, creating skepticism about government commitments and debt management.

For diaspora investors, trust has become the single biggest obstacle. Many remain uncertain about transparency, governance, and the future treatment of investors.

Weak Legal and Regulatory Frameworks

Weak contract enforcement, limited creditor protections, corruption concerns, and political interference undermine investor confidence. Fragile legal systems increase sovereign risk and make diaspora bonds less attractive in international markets.

The absence of robust investor protection mechanisms also raises concerns regarding transparency and fund management.

High Transaction and Compliance Costs

Issuing diaspora bonds internationally is expensive. Legal structuring, regulatory registration, underwriting, credit ratings, and marketing costs can consume 4–5% of the bond’s value.

Compliance with U.S., UK, and Canadian securities laws adds further complexity and expense.

Currency and Inflation Risks

Exchange-rate volatility poses a major challenge. Depreciation of the cedi can significantly reduce returns for investors holding local-currency-denominated instruments. Persistent inflation further erodes investment value.

 Limited Diaspora Data

Ghana lacks comprehensive data on the size, income levels, geographic distribution, and investment preferences of its diaspora population. Informal remittance channels further complicate data collection.

Without accurate mapping, targeted engagement and product design become difficult.

Mismatch Between Investor Expectations and Bond Structure

Diaspora investors may prefer liquidity and flexible investment products, while many diaspora bonds require long-term commitments. Not all diaspora members are high-net-worth individuals willing to lock away funds for extended periods.

 Institutional Fragmentation and Policy Gaps

Multiple agencies manage diaspora affairs without a unified national strategy. This fragmentation weakens communication, coordination, and investor engagement.

 Fragmented Diaspora Communities

The Ghanaian diaspora is diverse and divided along ethnic, political, generational, and regional lines. This makes it difficult to build a unified investment narrative.

Over-concentration on Western Diaspora Markets

Government engagement has focused heavily on Europe and North America while overlooking significant Ghanaian populations within Africa, the Middle East, and Asia.

1Risks from Overreliance on Remittances

Although remittances are relatively stable, they remain vulnerable to global economic shocks, migration policy changes, and labor market conditions abroad. Heavy reliance on remittance-backed financing could expose Ghana to future repayment risks.

Strategic Recommendations for a Successful Diaspora Bond Program

 Position Diaspora Bonds as a Core Development Financing Tool

Diaspora bonds should become a central pillar of Ghana’s long-term development financing strategy. Rather than financing general budget support, proceeds should fund visible infrastructure projects such as roads, railways, energy systems, healthcare, and water infrastructure.

Linking investments directly to national development projects strengthens investor confidence and patriotic appeal.

Leverage Remittance Securitisation

Ghana should securitise future remittance flows by using predictable inflows as collateral for bond issuance. Through special purpose vehicles (SPVs), remittances can back offshore bond structures that reassure investors and improve credit ratings.

Countries such as Brazil and Turkey have successfully used similar structures to access cheaper financing.

Tie Bonds to Specific High-Impact Projects

Investors are more likely to participate when funds are clearly earmarked for identifiable national projects. Transparency regarding the use of proceeds is essential.

Projects such as highways, railways, dams, airports, and energy systems can create stronger emotional and developmental connections for diaspora investors.

 Strengthen Institutional Backing

Partnerships with credible multilateral institutions such as the African Export-Import Bank and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency can improve investor confidence through guarantees, technical support, and risk mitigation.

International institutional backing reduces political and commercial risk perceptions.

Invest in Diaspora Mapping and Data Collection

The government must develop detailed databases capturing diaspora demographics, geographic locations, income levels, investment behavior, and sectoral interests.

Accurate data will allow authorities to design targeted investment products and communication strategies

.Strengthen Legal and Regulatory Frameworks

Ghana should introduce stronger legislation governing diaspora bond issuance, investor protection, transparency, and fund management.

Improving legal certainty, creditor protection, and governance standards is critical to attracting international investors.

Build Robust Investor Protection Mechanisms

Investor confidence can be strengthened through:

• Foreign currency-denominated bonds
• Escrow arrangements
• Partial guarantees from multilateral institutions
• Tax incentives
• SEC registration and international regulatory compliance
• Remittance-backed repayment structures

These safeguards are particularly important given Ghana’s recent debt restructuring experience.

 Enhance Flexibility and Product Appeal

Diaspora bonds should offer flexible investment options, including varying maturities, denominations, currencies, and repayment structures.

Allowing investors to receive payments in local or foreign currencies can broaden participation among diaspora investors with business interests in Ghana.

Ensure Transparency in the Use of Proceeds

Transparency is essential. Investors must clearly understand how funds are being used and what developmental outcomes are expected.

Countries such as Israel successfully leveraged diaspora financing because investors saw tangible national transformation resulting from their contributions.

Regular reporting, audits, and project updates should therefore be mandatory.

 Rebuild Trust Through Governance and Policy Credibility

Trust is ultimately the foundation of diaspora bond success. Ghana must rebuild confidence through macroeconomic stability, fiscal discipline, anti-corruption reforms, transparent governance, and consistent communication.

Diaspora investors must believe that funds will be managed responsibly and protected from political interference.

Conclusion

Diaspora remittances already play a critical role in Ghana’s economy, providing foreign exchange stability and supporting millions of households. However, the country has yet to fully harness these flows for long-term productive investment.

The proposed diaspora bond initiative offers Ghana an opportunity to transform remittances from consumption-driven transfers into a sustainable source of development finance. Yet the success of this strategy will depend not on patriotism alone, but on trust, institutional credibility, financial sophistication, and transparent governance.

The experiences of Israel, India, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Kenya, and Ghana itself demonstrate that diaspora bonds succeed only when governments combine emotional appeal with sound financial structures, strong legal protections, flexible design, and credible macroeconomic management.

For Ghana, the challenge is broader than issuing another bond. It is about rebuilding investor confidence after the debt restructuring crisis, strengthening institutions, improving regulatory frameworks, and creating transparent mechanisms that align diaspora interests with national development goals.

If implemented effectively, diaspora bonds could unlock a powerful new financing frontier, enabling Ghana to mobilise billions of dollars for infrastructure, industrialisation, energy, and economic transformation while deepening engagement with its global diaspora community.

Access the complete paper via https://thebftonline.com/2026/05/19/unlocking-diaspora-remittances-a-strategic-blueprint-for-shifting-consumption-based-remittances-into-investment/

Corporate Governance/ Banking Consultant

 

 

 

 

The post Unlocking diaspora remittances for investment growth appeared first on The Business & Financial Times.

Read Full Story